California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Petronella, G044628 (Cal. App. 2013):
People v. Cortez (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 994 presents an analogous circumstance. A defendant convicted of transporting heroin argued it was "'a violation of equal protection to punish'" more seriously one whose "'possession of heroin for personal use . . . was not "stationary,"'" than "one who possesses heroin for personal use, but is not in motion when arrested . . . ." (Id. at p. 999.) The appellate court rejected this
Page 11
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.