When will a defendant be charged with an equal protection violation under the Equal Protection Act?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Kelly, E063517 (Cal. App. 2016):

prosecutors to exercise their discretion when charging particular defendants. We agree with the People. "[N]umerous factors properly may enter into a prosecutor's decision to charge under one statute and not another, such as a defendant's background and the severity of the crime, and so long as there is no showing that a defendant 'has been singled out deliberately for prosecution on the basis of some invidious criterion,' that is, '"one that is arbitrary and thus unjustified because it bears no rational relationship to legitimate law enforcement interests[,]"' the defendant cannot make out an equal protection violation. [Citation.]" (People v. Wilkinson, supra, at pp. 838-839.)

Other Questions


Does the denial of access to the courts by the Department of Justice to defend a civil case against a defendant who is not able to pay for a lawyer to represent him in court constitute a prima facie equal protection violation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated a defendant's claim for equal protection under the equal protection clause? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant is convicted of a lesser charge of a greater charge of sexual assault, is the lesser charge necessarily included in the greater charge? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for an equal protection claim under the equal protection principles when a defendant is convicted of receiving a stolen vehicle? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for making an equal protection claim under the equal protection clause? (California, United States of America)
Does the death penalty law violate equal protection by denying procedural rights to non-capital defendants? (California, United States of America)
Does a capital sentencing scheme violate equal protection by denying procedural safeguards that would otherwise be available to non-capital defendants? (California, United States of America)
Does the death penalty law violate equal protection by denying procedural rights to non-capital defendants? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for equal protection under the equal protection clause? (California, United States of America)
Does not offend equal protection principles by failing to provide capital defendants with the same procedural safeguards as non-capital defendants at the penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.