Is "any touching" of an underage girl a crime?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Rutherford, B294725 (Cal. App. 2020):

"[S]ection 288 . . . require[s] no particular form of physical contact. . . . [T]he crime occurs whenever the trier of fact determines, based on all the circumstances, that an underage child was 'touched' with the requisite sexual intent." (People v. Martinez (1995) 11 Cal.4th 434, 438.) Thus, "section 288 is violated by 'any touching' of an underage child committed with the intent to sexually arouse either the defendant or the child." (People v. Martinez, supra, at p. 442.)

Other Questions


When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the target crime? (California, United States of America)
Is a charged crime a natural and probable consequence of the target crime if the charged crime was reasonably foreseeable? (California, United States of America)
Is a lesser included crime to another crime where both crimes are charged? (California, United States of America)
What is the law on unanimity in a criminal case where the evidence of a crime is only a single crime but the evidence supports the theory of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who is convicted of receiving stolen property in one crime, but never charged or convicted of the other crime, be required to pay restitution for losses sustained in other crimes? (California, United States of America)
Is a person who aids or abets a crime liable for the crime if the original crime was committed independently by another person? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
If a criminal commits a crime in a different county than the one where the crime was committed, would that change the outcome of the criminal trial if the crime occurred in the other county? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.