Is a motion under section 995 of the Penal Code a determination of a factual issue relating to the merits of the case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Montalvo, 117 Cal.App.3d 790, 173 Cal.Rptr. 51 (Cal. App. 1981):

[117 Cal.App.3d 796] As stated in Kohn v. Superior Court, supra, 239 Cal.App.2d at pages 430-431, 48 Cal.Rptr. 832, a ruling on a motion under section 995 of the Penal Code does not constitute a determination of a factual issue relating to the merits of the case. Such a ruling "... merely reviews the evidence. It does not substitute its judgment as to the weight thereof ... nor does it resolve conflicting factual contentions.... The function ... involves the determination of a legal issue only.... It is not enough that a judge make a determination which relates to contested fact issues. He must have actually resolved or determined conflicting factual contentions relating to the merits prior to trial before the right to disqualify is lost."

While it is true that a trial judge, in determining whether to accept or reject a

Page 55

Other Questions


What is the relevant case law in the context of Section 2(1) of the California Penal Code, and what is the case law relating to Section 4 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does a judge have to make a determination of a factual issue relating to the merits of the case? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Penal Code allow for an act or omission that is punishable by different sections of the Penal Code to be punished by one or more sections? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion to quash a finding that a determination of the merits of the complaint is not within the scope of the issues raised on the motion? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have defendants not challenged the authority of the court as opposed to the jury to make a factual determination in a Penal Code section 654 case? (California, United States of America)
How have the cases of two separate sexual assault cases been determined to be cross-admissible under section 1101 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the Defendant have any grounds to argue that it was error to deny the Defendant's motion to dismiss the Motion to Dismiss under section 995 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who has been given a life sentence for an assault with intent to murder be convicted of the crime under section 12022(a) of the Penal Code section 120 22(b) and section 5.5 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of a lesser included crime of the same crime under both sections of the California Penal Code and Section 654 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.