How have the cases of two separate sexual assault cases been determined to be cross-admissible under section 1101 of the Criminal Code?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Espinoza, H039787 (Cal. App. 2015):

admissible under Evidence Code section 1101" in order for them to be admissible under Evidence Code section 1108. (People v. Loy (2011) 52 Cal.4th 46, 63.) The trial court therefore did not abuse its discretion by determining that the two cases contained sufficient similarities as to make them cross-admissible in separate prosecutions.

Other Questions


For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
How have the cases of two separate sexual assault cases been deemed to be cross-admissible under section 1101 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1108 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, section 1101, subdivision (a) of the Criminal Code, allow for "propensity" evidence in sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1108, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code, section 352, make evidence of uncharged sexual misconduct in a sexual assault case admissible? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a sexual assault conviction under section 288 of Section 288 of the California Code of Criminal Code when a defendant pulls the victim's head forward to perform oral sex acts? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1170.1 of the California Criminal Code apply to separate criminal cases that are sentenced separately but ordered to run concurrently? (California, United States of America)
Is a criminal offence punishable by section 654 (a) of the Criminal Code of Ontario's Criminal Code punishable by Section 654, subdivision (a), punishable by the same law, punishable by a different law? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant section of the Penal Code for assault and sexual assault against a man who was found guilty of the same offence in a separate case? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.