In what circumstances have defendants not challenged the authority of the court as opposed to the jury to make a factual determination in a Penal Code section 654 case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Ross, 201 Cal.App.3d 1232, 247 Cal.Rptr. 827 (Cal. App. 1988):

5 Nor do we place any weight on the footnote in People v. Raby (1986) 179 Cal.App.3d 577, 582, fn. 1, 224 Cal.Rptr. 576, also relied upon by defendants, wherein the court observed: "Curiously, so far as we are aware, no one has ever challenged the authority of the court, as opposed to the jury, to make this factual determination in ... Penal code section 654 situations." It is unclear whether the court thought the failure to challenge "curious" because it may have merit or because it is unusual for the defense bar to long leave any stone unturned. In any event, the court did not seriously address the issue.

** See footnote *, ante.

Other Questions


When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant case law in the context of Section 2(1) of the California Penal Code, and what is the case law relating to Section 4 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority or authority to determine whether each defendant qualified as a "person" under section 1983 of the California Human Rights Act? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of a lesser included crime of the same crime under both sections of the California Penal Code and Section 654 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's sentence challenge based on Penal Code section 654 a challenge that affects the validity of his no contest pleas? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.