In this context, the defendants have satisfied the three-part test for an injunction, at least to allow the Minister to make a decision one way or the other. If necessary, I will grant standing to the defendants as public interest litigants for this purpose: see Finlay v. Canada (Minister of Finance), 1986 CanLII 6 (SCC), [1986] 2 S.C.R. 607. There is obviously a serious question to be tried, at least by the Minister, as to whether a stop work order should be issued. If the injunction is not granted, the work is commenced, and habitat is destroyed, the harm will be irreparable. I am persuaded that the balance of convenience favours an injunction of short duration.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.