The applicant did not testify and as a result there was no explanation for his not having included such significant information in his sponsored spouse questionnaire and narrative. I infer from the absence of the applicant’s testimony that his evidence would have exposed facts unfavourable to the success of the appeal: see Ma v. Canada (Immigration and Citizenship).[7]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.