Is there any case law where a member of the applicant’s medical report concluded that the medical evidence presented by the applicant was inconsistent with the applicant's testimony on the issue of paralysis?

The applicant suggests that the negative finding of credibility with regard to the inconsistency between his testimony and the medical reports he proffered as evidence was a microscopic review of the evidence. For this, he has cited Attakora v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1989] F.C.J. No. 444 (F.C.A.). In my view, the Member’s concerns about the inconsistency on the question of paralysis are not microscopic to the extent of the panel’s examination of the evidence in Attakora. The reports tendered did not support the applicant’s account of the effects of the beating he had suffered and the member did not err in relying upon that.