How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving self-defence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Colin, E067247 (Cal. App. 2018):

defendant did not act in self-defense. Defendant merely speculates the jurors were confused but we must presume the jurors followed the instructions. (People v. Boyette (2002) 29 Cal.4th 381, 431.)

Other Questions


How have the courts interpreted the instructions in the context of manslaughter instructions in cases where the instruction was limited or limited? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted attorney-client privilege in cases involving personal information disclosure in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory references to the Penal Code in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted special instruction in a case involving a defendant's hospital statement to a police officer? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the felony-murder instruction in cases involving assault with a deadly weapon? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving gang members? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted privilege in cases involving personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.