How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving sexual assault cases?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from The People v. Maldonado, E048957, No. FSB800905 (Cal. App. 2010):

Further, the jury was instructed that they were to ignore that evidence. We must presume that the jury understood and followed the instructions. (People v. Jablonski (2006) 37 Cal.4th 774, 834.)

Other Questions


How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted evidence in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the standard of proof in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory references to the Penal Code in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the felony-murder instruction in cases involving assault with a deadly weapon? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted sentencing instructions in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.