How have courts interpreted the statute of limitation in cases where sales were made to minors who presented fake identification documents?

In Keane v. Reilly the foregoing holdings interpreting the statute were applied to a case where sales had been made to minors who presented fake identification documents. One had been carefully prepared to resemble a bona fide official identification card, another was a driver's license belonging to someone else, but on which the physical description fitted the minor with fair accuracy, and the other was a driver's license belonging to another from whom the minor had obtained it for the purpose of 'fooling bartenders' and which showed a physical description that roughly fitted the minor. We quote the following headnote: