How have courts interpreted "shame excuses" in the context of discrimination cases?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Jones, 213 Cal.Rptr.3d 167, 7 Cal.App.5th 787 (Cal. App. 2017):

from sham excuses. [Citation.] So long as the trial court makes a sincere and reasoned effort to evaluate the nondiscriminatory justifications offered, its conclusions are entitled to deference on appeal. [Citations.]' " (People v. Lenix (2008) 44 Cal.4th 602, 613614, 80 Cal.Rptr.3d 98, 187 P.3d 946, fn. omitted.)

Other Questions


Does the court have any case law with respect to the interpretation of the law in the context of personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the principles of the Virginia Pharmacy case in the context of a disciplinary rule forbidding attorney advertising? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the law in the context of a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a motor vehicle insurance contract in the context of an arbitration? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the definition of "duress" in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the case law in the context of employment law? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted excuse instructions in a motor vehicle case? (California, United States of America)
How have the voir dire questions in a criminal case been interpreted by the trial court and the prosecutor in this case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights in the context of criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.