How have courts interpreted the law in the context of a personal injury case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from CABLE CONNECTION INC. v. DIRECTV INC., 190 P.3d 586, 44 Cal.4th 1334, 82 Cal.Rptr.3d 229 (Cal. 2008):

Crofoot quoted Sapp v. Barenfeld (1949) 34 Cal.2d 515, 523, 212 P.2d 233, for the proposition that [a]rbitrators, unless specifically required to act in conformity with rules of law, may base their decision upon broad principles of justice and equity, and in doing so may expressly or impliedly reject a claim

[190 P.3d 603]

Other Questions


Does the court have any case law with respect to the interpretation of the law in the context of personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted attorney-client privilege in cases involving personal information disclosure in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted "bodily injury" in the context of personal injury? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted privilege in cases involving personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.