How have courts interpreted section 425.16 of the anti-SLAPP statute?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Tamman v. Nixon Peabody LLP, B252332 (Cal. App. 2014):
to strike the complaint and instead relied on case law broadly construing section 425.16 to apply to conduct "'"arising from defendant's litigation activity."'" (Rusheen v. Cohen (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1048, 1056.) The trial court ruled that appellant failed to meet its burden to show that its refusing indemnification was conduct subject to the anti-SLAPP statute. We find no basis to disturb this conclusion.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Does section 125.3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure apply to the construction of the statute, and if so, does the court have jurisdiction to interpret the interpretation of the law? (California, United States of America)
Is section 1001.36 of the California Criminal Code a "stressed interpretation" of the law and, if so, would it be impertinent for the court to place a strained interpretation upon the statute? (California, United States of America)
When a section of the California Civil Code provides for construction of a statute, how do courts interpret the construction of the statute? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted section 28(d) and section 28 (f) of the Criminal Code in determining credibility of a witness? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted Section 209(a) of the aggravated kidnapping statute? (California, United States of America)
How has section 654 of the California Criminal Code been interpreted and interpreted by courts? (California, United States of America)
How has section 667.5(b) of the California Criminal Code been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
When an agency adopts a new interpretation of a statute and rejects an old interpretation of the statute? (California, United States of America)
How has section 69894.1 of the California Constitution been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
