How has section 69894.1 of the California Constitution been interpreted and interpreted by the courts?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Harris v. Bloodgood, 132 Cal.App.3d 477, 183 Cal.Rptr. 193 (Cal. App. 1982):

[132 Cal.App.3d 482] The holding in Olson v. Cory, supra, 27 Cal.3d 532, 178 Cal.Rptr. 568, 636 P.2d 532, left in its wake two viable statutes covering the same subject. There existed between January 1, 1977, and January 6, 1981, not one, but two levels of "compensation of superior court judges." Thus, section 69894.1, which is intrinsically unambiguous, became latently ambiguous because of extrinsic circumstances. It has become our task to resolve this ambiguity in a manner which is at once just to the taxpayers and to the appellants. That task is the more formidable as the situation appears to be unique, and the road to resolution is almost entirely bereft of signposts.

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Is section 28, subdivision (d) of the California Constitution harmonized with section I, article I, section 15 of the constitution with respect to self-incrimination? (California, United States of America)
How has section 1202.4 of the California Constitution been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1021.5 of the California Constitution on attorney fees? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of section 28 of the California Constitution when it comes to the exclusion or limitation of prior felony convictions for impeachment? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1018 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant makes a statement in open court that authorizes or adopts a motion to withdraw his plea? (California, United States of America)
How has section 667.5(b) of the California Criminal Code been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the term "appellate jurisdiction" in article VI, section 11 of the California Constitution? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have any power or authority to interpret a section of the California Penal Code that is ambiguous and ambiguous? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.