How do courts interpret a specific intent to injure?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Torres v. Parkhouse Tire Service, Inc., 75 Cal.App.4th 1195, 89 Cal.Rptr.2d 790 (Cal. App. 1999):

refer to a specific intent to injure if it is to have any meaning. (Soares v. City of Oakland, supra, 9 Cal.App.4th at p. 1830, 12 Cal.Rptr.2d 405.) The court also regarded this holding as consistent with the exclusive remedy policy of the workers' compensation scheme. (Id. at p. 1828, 12 Cal. Rptr.2d 405.)

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the concept of "knowledge" in the definition of intent in the context of possession with intent to sell? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the courts interpret section 278.5 of the California Penal Code as requiring the state to prove specific intent? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the specific intent instructions under the standard aiding and abetting instructions? (California, United States of America)
Is there a specific intent for a non-specific-intent crime? (California, United States of America)
If assault requires the intent to injure the victim, can assault be a specific intent crime? (California, United States of America)
Is it a federal error that crime requires general not specific intent rather than specific intent? (California, United States of America)
Is the intent of an aider and abettor to facilitate the commission of a specific intent crime necessarily the intent to achieve a future consequence? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the meaning of specific intent under the felony-murder doctrine? (California, United States of America)
Is a jury's instruction that a crime requires specific intent not specific intent invalidating a defendant's due process under the US Constitution? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.