Is it a federal error that crime requires general not specific intent rather than specific intent?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Manning, D074891 (Cal. App. 2019):

doubt"]; People v. Haley (2004) 34 Cal.4th 283, 314 [mistaken instruction that crime required general not specific intent is federal constitutional error].)

Other Questions


What is the effect of referring to count 3 as a specific intent crime rather than a general intent crime? (California, United States of America)
Is sexual penetration a specific intent crime rather than a general intent crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between the mental state required for a conviction of a specific intent crime and that of those convicted of a general intent crime? (California, United States of America)
Does a general intent crime require specific intent? (California, United States of America)
Is a jury's instruction that a crime requires specific intent not specific intent invalidating a defendant's due process under the US Constitution? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a general intent crime and a specific intent crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a finding that a crime committed by appellant was committed with the specific intent to commit a crime against a specific gang member? (California, United States of America)
If assault requires the intent to injure the victim, can assault be a specific intent crime? (California, United States of America)
What are the labels 'specific intent' and 'general intent' used to describe the crime of selling a dangerous drug? (California, United States of America)
How to instruct a jury on general intent when a specific intent crime is charged against a defendant? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.