Does the rejection of a finding that the letter was deceptive or misleading?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. He, 2012 BCCA 318 (CanLII):

With respect, I am unable to agree with the rejection of the trial judge’s conclusions concerning the letter. In my view, the trial judge was critical of the letter as much for what it failed to include as for what it did include. The finding by the trial judge that the letter was deceptive or misleading was a finding of fact, and as such entitled to deference, in the absence of a legal or palpable and overriding error: Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235.

Other Questions


What is the test for a finding that a judge must not make a finding which would directly contradict a finding previously made by another judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of an inquiry committee in a finding of negligence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for malicious intent in the context of an appeal against the findings of a finding of malicious intent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for judicial review of the findings of the Disability Review Officer's findings of fact, law or mixed fact and law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of deceptive evidence on a finding that the payee spouse is not an employable? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a management who makes defamatory statements to an employee in a termination letter and copy that letter to other employees be protected by qualified privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge relitigate a finding in a motion where the original finding was invalid? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a finding of no misconduct in a professional conduct review panel finding no misconduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a letter carrier who is unable to carry a load of letters? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff reject an offer to purchase lot 35 of the property for capricious reasons? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.