While that is an important factor, the fundamental concern must always be what was the dominant purpose for the coming into being of the document. I agree completely with Taggart J.A.'s reasons for saying that the bank did not establish the dominant purpose here to come within the excerpt from Grant v. Downs. I would, therefore, allow the appeal.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.