What is the test for awarding costs pursuant to Rule 57 of the BCSC?

In Fotheringham v. Fotheringham, 2001 BCSC 1321 [Fotheringham], Bouck J. articulated the four‑part inquiry to be used when awarding costs pursuant to the then Rule 57 at para. 46 as follows: 1. First, by focusing on the “matters in dispute” at the trial. These may or may not include “issues” explicitly mentioned in the pleadings. 2. Second, by assessing the weight or importance of those “matters” to the parties. 3. Third, by doing a global determination with respect to all the matters in dispute and determining which party “substantially succeeded,” overall and therefore won the event. 4. Fourth, where one party “substantially succeeded,” a consideration of whether there are reasons to “otherwise order” that the winning party be deprived of his or her costs and each side then bear their own costs.