What are the implications of the BCSC’s Costs provisions in the context of litigation costs?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Jayetileke v. Blake, 2010 BCSC 1478 (CanLII):

Costs provisions are intended to encourage the reduction of litigation expense, and to discourage conduct that has the opposite effect. Costs awards are designed to encourage settlement by penalizing the party that declines an offer to settle which was better than the trial result: Bailey v. Jang, 2008 BCSC 1372, 90 B.C.L.R. (4th) 125 at paras. 15-17.

Other Questions


Can a successful litigant be held liable for the costs of a successful plaintiff who deliberately provides false evidence at any stage of the litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the costs rules in the context of litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to pay defendants' costs throughout the course of the litigation if he does not receive his costs until March 2017? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has 9-1(6)(c) been interpreted in the context of litigation costs in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is security for costs of an appeal cost more readily than security for trial costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has 9-1(6)(c) of the Rules on litigation costs been interpreted in the context of insurance coverage? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reasonable conduct in litigation reasonable enough to warrant a reduction in costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on costs in family litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the tort of civil conspiracy in the context of lightweight aggregate litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that an action is ultimately dismissed in its entirety have to be taken into account in the context of double cost calculations? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.