Is there any evidence that neither party has achieved substantial success as defined in Fotheringham v.Fotheringham?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Trytten-Bradley v. Buckley, 2016 BCSC 103 (CanLII):
Considering all of the above, I conclude that neither party has achieved “substantial success” as defined in Fotheringham v. Fotheringham 2001 BCSC 1321 and as a result the parties will bear their own costs. “Jenkins J.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a successful party have the right to claim special costs when the successful party is in a relationship with an opposing party? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to award costs for substantial success based on substantial success? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for a successful party to recover costs from the successful party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the consequences of a party's success rate when it is not substantially successful? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for “substantial success” in determining whether either party had a good chance of success in their claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is considered substantial success when it comes to calculating the proportion of substantial success? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted subrule on a claim of substantially successful and/or substantially successful in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test to determine whether a party has been "substantially successful" in its claim for damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a successful party who has given a willfully dishonest evidence deny the denial of costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for denying a substantially successful party's costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
