What are the consequences of a party's success rate when it is not substantially successful?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Aschenbrenner v. Yahemech, 2010 BCSC 1541 (CanLII):
Where success is divided such that there is no substantially successful party, the parties may have to bear their own costs (Mari v. Mari, 2001 BCSC 1848, [2001] B.C.J. No. 2979).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a successful party have the right to claim special costs when the successful party is in a relationship with an opposing party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for a successful party to recover costs from the successful party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for “substantial success” in determining whether either party had a good chance of success in their claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted subrule on a claim of substantially successful and/or substantially successful in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is considered substantial success when it comes to calculating the proportion of substantial success? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to award costs for substantial success based on substantial success? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of Justice Griffin's comments in the context of the Court of Appeal's decision in the case of the unsuccessful party seeking special costs against the successful party? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the law of agency apply when one party gives explicit or implicit authority to another party (the principal) to enter contracts with third parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for denying a substantially successful party's costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the intention or understanding of a party to a transaction where a party intended to transfer a vehicle to another party? (British Columbia, Canada)
