What is the test for “substantial success” in determining whether either party had a good chance of success in their claim?

British Columbia, Canada

The following excerpt is from Firth v. Firth, 2014 BCSC 193 (CanLII):

The determination of whether either party had substantial success here requires me to engage in an objective assessment, “taking into account all the matters in dispute, their weight or importance to the parties and the parties' relative success or failure with respect to those matters”: Fotheringham v. Fotheringham, 2001 BCSC 1321 at para. 60. In that decision, Mr. Justice Bouck defined substantial success as being “about 75% or better” on the important issues in dispute.

Cole J.’s reasons on the summary trial were not transcribed. To give some context to his orders I have listened to the recording of his reasons for judgment. The parties were of course both present at the summary trial and have been able, I infer, to bring to my attention whatever aspects of that proceeding they felt were relevant, so there is no prejudice to them in my resorting to the recorded reasons: Gill v. A & P Fruit Growers Ltd., 2011 BCSC 1809 at paras. 20-21.

Other Questions

Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test to determine whether a party has been "substantially successful" in its claim for damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a successful party have the right to claim special costs when the successful party is in a relationship with an opposing party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for determining whether there has been anordinate delay in determining whether a claim has been successful? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted subrule on a claim of substantially successful and/or substantially successful in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test used to determine whether to award costs to the successful party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a party has intended to injure another party in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to award costs for substantial success based on substantial success? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the relevant factors for determining whether either of two possible jurisdictions would be suitable for the determination of issues raised by the litigation at issue? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a claim can be successful at the Workers’s Compensation Appeal Tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)

Whitelogo nobg 300dpi sm

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.