Is a plaintiff entitled to double or increased costs because of an offer made before judgment?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Cador v. Chichak, 1998 ABQB 881 (CanLII):

Should she have double or increased costs because of the offer made before judgment? In my opinion, she should. The rule may in fact be subject to some criticism: (See Marshall v. Butt, (supra).) It is nonetheless the rule and, in my opinion, it is a salutary one and should not be avoided in family law matters. The sanction for failing to accept a good offer should be available, and it is helpful in avoiding useless or protracted litigation. I see no reason to depart from the rule in this case.

Other Questions


Is a party entitled to double costs where it recovers a judgment that is more favourable than the amount offered? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the City have "special reasons" to deny double costs or to award solicitor-client costs? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for awarding double costs from the date of the making of an offer? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there a "special reason" for not awarding double costs to an appellant who has rejected an offer to settle a liquidated claim? (Alberta, Canada)
When can a court order a cost under a tortfeasor’s order for costs in any event or cost in the cause? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a plaintiff lawyer entitled to 12 months notice when he is dismissed by his employer? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to be put in a position he or she would have been in if the misrepresentation had not been made? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a plaintiff's estate entitled to receive payments from the operators of surface lease agreements? (Alberta, Canada)
Can an offer to buy land be accepted at a price that includes tax arrears, costs and interest? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a mortgagee entitled to all his costs and expenses? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.