Does the City have "special reasons" to deny double costs or to award solicitor-client costs?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Edmonton (City of) v. Lovat Tunnel Equipment Inc., 2002 ABQB 1033 (CanLII):

Rotek argues that the City’s allegations do not come close to amounting to “special reasons” to deny double costs or to award solicitor-client costs and, even if they did, Rotek did not and has not conducted itself in a manner “significantly more deserving of censure” than the City itself, which is the test set out in Morris v. Hunt, supra.

Other Questions


Is there a "special reason" for not awarding double costs to an appellant who has rejected an offer to settle a liquidated claim? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the consequences of a court awarding a lump sum award of costs in a personal injury case? (Alberta, Canada)
When can a court order a cost under a tortfeasor’s order for costs in any event or cost in the cause? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for awarding double costs from the date of the making of an offer? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for awarding costs to the successful litigant? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances have courts found a mother guilty of parental alienation and/or found her to be in contempt and ordered a sanction of costs to indemnify the father for all costs of the proceedings? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a breach of trust or fiduciary duty result in the award of solicitor and client costs? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a special endorsement on a specially endorsed writ contain an allegation that notice of dishonour was given? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to double or increased costs because of an offer made before judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a court bound by law to award costs in favour of the successful party against the unsuccessful party? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.