How have the courts treated the issue of substantial prejudice in cases involving good faith and substantial prejudice?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Archibald v. Security Management Services, 2021 HRTO 667 (CanLII):
In light of the findings above regarding good faith, it is unnecessary to address the issue of substantial prejudice. See Esanu v. Georgetown Men’s Non-Contact Hockey League, 2009 HRTO 579.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts dealt with the issue of home ownership issues in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts treated the issue of a proposed duty of care in a motor vehicle accident case? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of possession for purposes cases involving hotel rooms? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of substantial prejudice in an application for a non-contact hockey league? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of the Court of Appeal's ruling in cases involving sexual assault cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts in Canada dealt with the issue of personal injury cases involving personal injury claims? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court treated the issue of credibility in the trial of a witness in a dog case? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of prejudice in a non-contact hockey case? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts treated privacy concerns for a plaintiff in her personal computer case? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of negligence in the context of personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
