How have the courts dealt with the issue of substantial prejudice in an application for a non-contact hockey league?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Krajnak v. Toronto District School Board, 2022 HRTO 254 (CanLII):

Since the applicant failed to establish a good faith reason for their delay in filing the Application, it is unnecessary to address the issue of substantial prejudice. See Esanu v. Georgetown Men’s Non-Contact Hockey League, 2009 HRTO 579.

Other Questions


How have the courts dealt with the issue of prejudice in a non-contact hockey league application? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts treated the issue of substantial prejudice in cases involving good faith and substantial prejudice? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of prejudice in a non-contact hockey case? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with an application where the applicant's disrespectful behaviour was so extreme that the application was dismissed as abuse of process? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of home ownership issues in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law relating to an accident benefit application where a delay in submitting the Application due to a personal relationship preventing the Applicant from making an application? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of equitable trust in a personal injury application? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of a delay in making an application for a non-contact hockey league application? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts in Taiwan dealt with the issue of parental consent to place a child with the paternal grandmother in Egypt? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of a fraudulent charge or mortgage in favor of a creditor? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.