How have the courts dealt with the issue of prejudice in a non-contact hockey case?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Toth v. Ontario (Training, Colleges and Universities), 2019 HRTO 1027 (CanLII):
As I found the applicant has failed to show that the delay was incurred in good faith, it is unnecessary for me to determine the issue of prejudice. See, Esanu v. Georgetown Non-Contact Hockey League, 2009 HRTO 579. ORDER
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts treated the issue of substantial prejudice in cases involving good faith and substantial prejudice? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of prejudice in a non-contact hockey league application? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of home ownership issues in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of substantial prejudice in an application for a non-contact hockey league? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of negligence in the context of personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts in Canada dealt with the issue of personal injury cases involving personal injury claims? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with contempt cases where a contemnor disregarded a court order to deliver business records? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of possession for purposes cases involving hotel rooms? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts in England and Wales dealt with the issue of unmerchantable hops? (Ontario, Canada)
