Does the holding in People v Castellanos need to be reconsidered?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The People v. Luton, B210423, Super. Ct. No. VA060687 (Cal. App. 2010):
Appellant, however, contends that the holding in People v. Castellanos should be reconsidered in light of the new residency restrictions that were imposed
Page 4
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the result of the Court of Appeal's second opinion in People v Cuen (People v. Cuen I) on a motion to review the Court's decision to deny the petition? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion to reconsider a motion denying a defendant's motion to modify a $100,000 restitution fine be reconsidered? (California, United States of America)
Are short people more likely to commit crimes in groups than tall people? (California, United States of America)
Does the penalty of death on death row apply to a defendant who killed two people in a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted "the people's right to due process" not to include the right to compel the press to supply unpublished information obtained in the newsgathering process? (California, United States of America)
If a warrantless arrest of appellant violates People v. Ramey, would the invalidation of the search warrant and suppression of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment that the People have no right to have their own mental health examination, and the insinuation that appellant had refused to consent, denied due process? (California, United States of America)
What is the rule of People v Cummings v Cummings? (California, United States of America)
Does the majority of the Supreme Court hold that there is no constitutional right to jury trial on the issue of premeditation? (California, United States of America)
Does the majority of the California Superior Court hold that prescription drug manufacturers are liable for injuries caused by their products? (California, United States of America)
