What is the rule of People v Cummings v Cummings?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Merritt, 2 Cal.5th 819, 216 Cal.Rptr.3d 265, 392 P.3d 421 (Cal. 2017):
For these reasons, we conclude that the rule of People v. Cummings , supra , 4 Cal.4th 1233, 1311-1315, 18 Cal.Rptr.2d 796, 850 P.2d 1, has no continuing validity. The error of
[392 P.3d 429]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the result of the Court of Appeal's second opinion in People v Cuen (People v. Cuen I) on a motion to review the Court's decision to deny the petition? (California, United States of America)
Are short people more likely to commit crimes in groups than tall people? (California, United States of America)
Does the penalty of death on death row apply to a defendant who killed two people in a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted "the people's right to due process" not to include the right to compel the press to supply unpublished information obtained in the newsgathering process? (California, United States of America)
If a warrantless arrest of appellant violates People v. Ramey, would the invalidation of the search warrant and suppression of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of granting immunity to a witness in the People v. Badgett case? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of counsel for the People yelling at a witness on the witness? (California, United States of America)
What is the People's burden to prove a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the People be successful in their claim for damages against a third party? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment that the People have no right to have their own mental health examination, and the insinuation that appellant had refused to consent, denied due process? (California, United States of America)
