Does the exclusionary rule apply to a warrantless entry?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Jenks, C088755 (Cal. App. 2020):

Since the Attorney General does not carry the burden of finding legal justification for the warrantless entry, the fruits of that entry generally must be suppressed. (Wong Sun v. United States (1963) 371 U.S. 471, 487-488 [9 L.Ed.2d 441, 455].) The Attorney General argues suppression is inappropriate here because the exclusionary rule's deterrent is ineffective where the police engage in nonculpable conduct. Not so.

Other Questions


Does the exclusionary rule apply to residential searches? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for warrantless entry by a police officer to a house in a residential street? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusionary rule apply to a defendant who has not had any Fourth Amendment rights infringed? (California, United States of America)
Is a warrantless entry into a home a violation of the Fourth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
Does the minute entry rule apply in cases where the original sentence consists of a fine only? (California, United States of America)
How has the court applied the exclusionary rule of People v. Cahan to cases pending on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusionary rule apply to a defendant who is aggrieved by an illegal search and seizure? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusionary rule on cross-examination apply to a probationer's testimony at his revocation hearing? (California, United States of America)
How does the exclusionary rule apply in conservatorship cases? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusionary rule apply to a probationer's home search? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.