Does a stipulation stating that a litigant must consent to the stipulation stated in open court constitute consent?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Johnston, Baker & Palmer v. Record Mach. & Tool Co., 183 Cal.App.2d 200, 6 Cal.Rptr. 847 (Cal. App. 1960):
A more recent case which discusses the matter of the acquiescence of a litigant in a stipulation stated in open court is Justice v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irr. Dist., 112 Cal.App.2d 516, 246 P.2d 134. In that case, the appeal was by the plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of the defendants and from
Page 853
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is an attorney bound by a stipulation even when the court considers imposition of harsher sanctions than those stipulated to by the attorney and the state bar? (California, United States of America)
Does a ruling by a trial court that adversely affects a litigant's evidentiary presentation constitute a constitutional error? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted consent in cases involving consent and consent? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have a duty to appoint a court-appointed interpreter for an indigent, non-English speaking litigant in a civil small claims proceeding? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have found that Defendant Joiner did not waive his assumed constitutional right to be personally present at the remand hearing and that the court erred in conducting that hearing in his absence? (California, United States of America)
Is it improper for a court, with the consent of the accused and his counsel, to provide a transcript to the jury in lieu of rereading testimony in open court? (California, United States of America)
Does the denial of access to the courts by the Department of Justice to defend a civil case against a defendant who is not able to pay for a lawyer to represent him in court constitute a prima facie equal protection violation? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law for self-represented litigants in civil litigation? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court treat a claim by a defendant that an issue raised and decided in the trial court resulted in constitutional violations? (California, United States of America)
In the absence of a decision by the California Supreme Court on the issue of consent for searches and seizures, what is the effect of the consent process in the context of this issue? (California, United States of America)
