How have courts interpreted consent in cases involving consent and consent?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Clifton v. City of Dinuba, F070582 (Cal. App. 2016):

words and acts, and not their unexpressed intentions or expectations. (Alexander v. Codemasters Group Limited (2002) 104 Cal.App.4th 129, 141 (Codemasters).) The existence of mutual consent presents a question of fact. (Ibid.)

Other Questions


How have the courts interpreted evidence in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the standard of proof in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted privilege in cases involving personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted consent in cases where officers asked for access to a suspect's room without the consent of the suspect? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory references to the Penal Code in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted attorney-client privilege in cases involving personal information disclosure in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted consent to give in a search warrant case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.