What is the burden on a defendant to prove that the police officers in the case are reasonable?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Fong v British Columbia (Minister of Justice), 2019 BCSC 263 (CanLII):

The burden is on the defendant to show that the police officers in this case fall within the protections of s. 25(1) of the Code: Crampton v. Walton, 2005 ABCA 81. As the court noted in that case:

Other Questions


Is it possible for a retired police officer to return to the police force where he worked as a community support officer because of his back pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a defendant failed to mitigate for a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an occupier to prove reasonable steps taken by the occupier were reasonable in all circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a police officer be ordered to produce a certificate that the adjudicator would like to compel the officer to produce? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for reasonable and proper use of force by a police officer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it improper for a police officer to delay making a call to legal counsel while the accused is being questioned at a police station? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden on a defendant to prove that a plaintiff has not followed a recommended course of medical treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a police officer engage in a police pursuit when he has the opportunity to follow a stolen vehicle using an unmarked car? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court review a decision by a police officer under section 90.3 of the Criminal Code when the officer applied the wrong test? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a defendant has not been seriously prejudiced in their actions? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.