What is the burden of proving that a defendant has not been seriously prejudiced in their actions?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Royal Bank of Canada v 0759452 B.C. Ltd., 2022 BCSC 131 (CanLII):

Where there has been inordinate delay, without reasonable excuse, a rebuttable presumption of prejudice arises. In these circumstances, the onus shifts to the plaintiff to establish on a balance of probabilities that the defendant has not been seriously prejudiced: Busse v. Chertkow, 1999 BCCA 313.

Other Questions


Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence an action against a defendant in the same action against the same defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving prejudice to a defendant in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defendant in a personal injury action make use of a medical report and clinical report obtained from an earlier and by then settled wrongful dismissal action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a defendant failed to mitigate for a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a party to a child was not aware of the consequences of the child’s parents’ actions? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the gap between a defendant and his co-defendant in a civil action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden on a defendant to prove that a plaintiff has not followed a recommended course of medical treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff acted unreasonably in her actions? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defendant in an action to prove a will in solemn form counterclaim under the Wills Variation Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of a defendant in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.