The respondent’s Capital Cost Allowance claims for these taxation years were analyzed by each of the parties having regard to the comments in Huber v. Yaroshko [2000] S.J. No. 201 (Q.B.)(QL) and the cases relied on therein - that is, with a view to determining the estimated useful lifespan of the respondent’s major pieces of farm equipment, determining what the straight line depreciation would be and then determining the excess that was claimed using the declining balance method employed for income tax purposes.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.