Can a defendant be convicted of two counts of murder and a substantive gang crime based upon the very same act of aiding and abetting?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from The People v. Perez, G042811, Super. Ct. No. 08ZF0020 (Cal. App. 2011):

As instructed in the present matter, the gang offense required defendant to have aided and abetted gang members in committing a felony. Defendant was found guilty of two counts of murder and one count of attempted murder, as well as the gang offense, based upon the very same act of aiding and abetting. He may be punished for each of the violent crimes (the murders and the attempted murder) based upon the same act because section 654 does not apply to violent crimes involving separate victims. (People v. Deloza (1998) 18 Cal.4th 585, 592.) He cannot, however, also be punished for the gang offense based upon the same act. The murders, the attempted murder, and the substantive gang count were all committed by defendant by the same act and with the same intent. The sentence imposed on count four must be stayed pursuant to section 654.

Page 24

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the Court reverse the conviction of defendant in the second-degree murder trial of a man convicted of the crime of murder for making false statements about the crime scene? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who aided and abetted a crime, the natural and probable consequence of which was murder, be convicted of the resulting murder? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of aiding and abetting a murder if the actual perpetrator of the same murder is convicted of murder? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of aiding and abetting a murder if the actual perpetrator is convicted of the same crime? (California, United States of America)
Can an offender be convicted of first degree murder based on direct aiding and abetting principles or under the felony-murder rule? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who is convicted of receiving stolen property in one crime, but never charged or convicted of the other crime, be required to pay restitution for losses sustained in other crimes? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant who knowingly aids and abets criminal conduct guilty of not only the intended crime but also of any other crime the perpetrator actually commits as a result of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of second degree felony murder where there is no law specifically criminalizing the crime at the time of the crime? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant is convicted of multiple crimes arising out of the same act or an indivisible course of conduct, can they be convicted of more than one of the crimes? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for an argument that the jury improperly instructed the jury to convict defendants for aiding and abetting assault or murder? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.