Is there any case law in which an order was there made for the benefit of the mortgagor, not for the purpose of a surety?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Campbell v. Morrison, 1897 CanLII 27 (ON CA):
Another case of Campbell v. Robinson, 27 Gr. 634, has been much criticised, and seems to have proceeded on the ground that the order was there made for the benefit of the mortgagor, who had become a mere surety for the purchasers of the equity of redemption.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When one parent is subject to a deportation order, can the court order a non-removal order? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the term "support order" need to be changed to include "support orders" in the definition of a support order? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test to prove that continuation of a support order would be continuation of the order if the support order is not inconsistent or absurd? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a court to order a temporary order or custody order in a custody matter? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for lifting a stay of execution on a motion to lift an order that would have lifted the stay of an order requiring the lifting of the order? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the consequences of a Director's Delegate's Order and Order to quash or to set aside or quash the two orders and decisions? (Ontario, Canada)
When will a court order an interim order to place a temporary order on a temporary parent? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a consent order enforceable if the consent order is amended or amended? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a variation of an interim order be made in the context of a motion to change a final order? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a court order a no costs order after a resolution has been concluded? (Ontario, Canada)
