What is the onus on the officer on a balance of probabilities?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Adeit v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2016 BCSC 669 (CanLII):
The onus of proof is on the Officer on a balance of probabilities: Pan v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2012 BCSC 1766 at para. 6.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of proof for a plaintiff to prove that a hypothetical event is not a probability, not a balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the tort of misfeasance in public office apply to an individual officer or officer? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the scope of a random stop by a police officer without any probable cause? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a finding of undue influence be based on the balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing on a balance of probabilities that a contract was formed? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on the balance of probability test? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove past events such as negligence on a balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing earnings loss on a balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving on a balance of probabilities that the assumptions were wrong? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff be considered a travelling employee for workers’ compensation purposes when he drives from his home to his employer’s office in Richmond, after driving to the employer's office? (British Columbia, Canada)
