Is there any inconsistency or two implausibilities in the finding that the applicant was not wanted for questioning?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Vallipuram v. Canada (Minister Of Citizenship And Immigration), 2001 FCT 1106 (CanLII):
The tribunal's finding that the applicant was not wanted for questioning was based, as noted, on what the tribunal found to be an inconsistency and two implausibilities. Aguebor v. Minister of Employment and Immigration (1994), 160 N.R. 315 is authority for the proposition the tribunal, a specialized one, has complete jurisdiction to determine the plausibility of testimony provided that plausibility findings are reasonably drawn on the evidence. Also, there can be no doubt the tribunal may base its findings on internal contradictions or inconsistencies which are at the heartland of the discretion of triers of fact.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If an applicant succeeds in his res judicata application, does the application have grounds to stay the application? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is there any case law where a member of the applicant’s medical report concluded that the medical evidence presented by the applicant was inconsistent with the applicant's testimony on the issue of paralysis? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What are the limits on the amount of time that a court can extend an application to extend the application for an extension of the application? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the impact of the interpreter at the hearing of an applicant's application for a disability benefits application? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the burden determination on an asylum application or the firm finding of an asylum seeker's firm finding need to be considered dispositive? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are the findings of a judge's finding that the affidavit in support of an application for a wiretap was not supported by probable cause and was stale? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the applicable standard of review for the purpose of determining an applicant's application for employment? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the test for an application to compel the Court to approve the publication of both the findings of an independent review and the analysis of both findings? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the test for granting an extension of time for an employee to complete an application for an extension to his time to complete his application? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the test for a stay of execution of an order to allow an application to stay an order that would have prevented the application from entering into the United States? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
