What is the burden of proving undue influence in the context of a testamentary instrument?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Stephens v. Austin, 2003 BCSC 341 (CanLII):

In the case of testamentary instruments, the burden of proof with respect to undue influence lies on those attacking the will. Suspicious circumstances surrounding its execution, while relevant, do not give rise to any presumption that assists in discharging that burden: Vout v. Hay, 1995 CanLII 105 (SCC), [1995] 2 S.C.R. 876 at para. 28.

Other Questions


What is the burden of proving undue influence in a civil case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law relating to undue influence or undue influence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving knowledge and approval of a will in relation to allegations of fraud and undue influence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving undue influence upon the promisor in a contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal framework for analyzing proof in solemn form claims where issues of undue influence and undue influence are raised? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is undue influence sufficient to establish that there is no force or coercion to establish undue influence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test to trigger a presumption of undue influence in the context of a commercial relationship? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving testamentary capacity on the propounder of the will? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the trial judge err in principle in the analysis of the issues of undue influence and testamentary capacity? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts in BC considered undue influence in the context of a will where the testator engaged in activities with his family members as a child? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.