In what circumstances will the trial judge err in principle in the analysis of the issues of undue influence and testamentary capacity?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from James v. Field, 2001 BCCA 267 (CanLII):

In light of the decision in Vout v. Hay, supra, I am of the opinion that the trial judge did not err in principle in the approach he took to the analysis of the issues of testamentary capacity and undue influence in the face of the suspicious circumstances.

Other Questions


How have the courts considered the role of suspicious circumstances in the issue of testamentary capacity and undue influence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a trial judge's failure to give reasons sufficient to determine that the trial judge erred in appreciation of a relevant issue or application of the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal framework for analyzing proof in solemn form claims where issues of undue influence and undue influence are raised? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is undue influence sufficient to establish that there is no force or coercion to establish undue influence? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a summary trial, in what circumstances will the court consider postponement issues in a full trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a single issue is proposed for summary trial by way of summary trial, does the court have any consideration in deciding the issue as a whole? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a summary trial judge be able to resolve issues where there are conflicting evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law relating to undue influence or undue influence? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge refuse to hear an application to review an order made by the issuing judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.