Is this the case of the admission of judicially authorized communications?
New Brunswick, Canada
The following excerpt is from Kindred v. R., 2018 NBCA 71 (CanLII):
This is a companion case to Williams v. R., 2018 NBCA 70. It concerns principally the admission of judicially authorized intercepted communications and an allegation of a violation of s. 11(d) of the Charter, among other issues.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for admissible source records in a sexual assault case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the effect of a weak privative clause in legislation that prohibits judicial review of a tribunal decision? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What authority does the court have to revoke an agreement where an agreement has been signed where the agreement was not revoked? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is a Respondent's duty to produce admissible evidence in a motion for summary judgment? (New Brunswick, Canada)
How close is the administrative process to the judicial process? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Is recent complaint evidence admissible at the instance of the crown? (New Brunswick, Canada)
When will a motion be heard in a different judicial district? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for obtaining an authorization to name someone as an object of interception? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What are the implications of the doctrine of judicial comity and the presumption against retrospectivity? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test on review of an authorization? (New Brunswick, Canada)
