When a plaintiff reasonably should have discovered facts for purposes of the accrual of a cause of action?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Tsaturyan v. Glaxosmithkline, LLC, B275168 (Cal. App. 2018):
"When a plaintiff reasonably should have discovered facts for purposes of the accrual of a cause of action or application of the delayed discovery rule is generally a question of fact, properly decided as a matter of law only if the evidence . . . can support only one reasonable conclusion." (Stella v. Asset Management
Page 16
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a plaintiff rely on the termination of her employment with defendant as the adverse employment action for the purposes of her retaliation cause of action? (California, United States of America)
What causes of action can a plaintiff bring in a common law cause of action for emotional distress and wrongful discharge? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
Does a finding that an unfair labor practice-related reason for termination constitute a preemption of a plaintiff's cause of action based on other illegal reasons? (California, United States of America)
Does the discovery rule apply to a plaintiff who has reason to discover the cause of action? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an inverse condemnation action against a governmental entity for damage caused to private property caused by a governmental action? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff maintain a malicious prosecution cause of action if the entire action in which it was filed has been terminated? (California, United States of America)
Is reasonable cause reasonable cause sufficient to warrantless arrest? (California, United States of America)
If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
