Does the discovery rule apply to a plaintiff who has reason to discover the cause of action?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Chen v. Jordan, D064717, D065587 (Cal. App. 2014):

Nonetheless, under the discovery rule, accrual of a cause of action may be "postponed until the plaintiff 'discovers, or has reason to discover, the cause of action.' " (Pooshs, supra, 51 Cal.4th at p. 797.) For purposes of this rule, discovery "occurs when the plaintiff 'has reason . . . to suspect a factual basis' for the action." (Ibid.) A plaintiff has reason to suspect a factual basis for the action when the plaintiff has notice of information or circumstances that would put a reasonable person on inquiry. (Norgart v. Upjohn Co., supra, 21 Cal.4th at p. 398.) "[T]he discovery rule most frequently applies when it is particularly difficult for the plaintiff to observe or understand the breach of

Page 7

duty, or when the injury itself (or its cause) is hidden or beyond what the ordinary person could be expected to understand." (Shively v. Bozanich (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1230, 1248.)

Other Questions


Does a finding that an unfair labor practice-related reason for termination constitute a preemption of a plaintiff's cause of action based on other illegal reasons? (California, United States of America)
What causes of action can a plaintiff bring in a common law cause of action for emotional distress and wrongful discharge? (California, United States of America)
When a plaintiff reasonably should have discovered facts for purposes of the accrual of a cause of action? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an inverse condemnation action against a governmental entity for damage caused to private property caused by a governmental action? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff maintain a malicious prosecution cause of action if the entire action in which it was filed has been terminated? (California, United States of America)
Does the anti-SLAPP statute apply to the form of a plaintiff's cause of action? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for "reasonably reasonable" liability for damages caused by natural causes? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.