California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Brendza v. Dep't of Motor Vehicles, A135022 (Cal. App. 2012):
When a party challenges a court's evidentiary ruling, a different standard of review applies. "Generally, we review the trial court's rulings regarding the admissibility of evidence under the deferential abuse of discretion standard. [Citation.]" (Molenda v. Department of Motor Vehicles (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 974, 986.) We will disturb a discretionary court ruling "only upon a showing of a clear case of abuse and a miscarriage of justice. [Citation.]" (Ibid.) We review issues of law de novo. (Garcia v. Department of Motor Vehicles (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 73, 82.)
2. Trustworthiness of Officer's Sworn Statement
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.