When a party challenges a court's evidentiary ruling, what is the standard of review?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Brendza v. Dep't of Motor Vehicles, A135022 (Cal. App. 2012):

When a party challenges a court's evidentiary ruling, a different standard of review applies. "Generally, we review the trial court's rulings regarding the admissibility of evidence under the deferential abuse of discretion standard. [Citation.]" (Molenda v. Department of Motor Vehicles (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 974, 986.) We will disturb a discretionary court ruling "only upon a showing of a clear case of abuse and a miscarriage of justice. [Citation.]" (Ibid.) We review issues of law de novo. (Garcia v. Department of Motor Vehicles (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 73, 82.)

2. Trustworthiness of Officer's Sworn Statement

Other Questions


In reviewing a section 654 challenge, what standard of review does the court apply in reviewing the challenge? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a challenge to a suppression ruling, how does the Court of Appeal review the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review of a trial court's rulings on evidentiary objections? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a lower court's ruling for abuse of power, does the court review the evidence or evaluate the credibility of witnesses? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a challenge to a suppression ruling, how do we review the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How do courts review a trial court's ruling on whether an examiner's question calls for a speculative answer under the abuse of discretion standard? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for appellate review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Are evidentiary rulings reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard of review? (California, United States of America)
How have courts reviewed the evidentiary rulings of a trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the "right ruling, wrong reasoning" rule apply to an evidentiary ruling that required the trial court to make findings of fact? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.