When a lessor wins an unlawful detainer action, does the court also have to determine the amount of rent owed to the lessor?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from 5500 S. Freeway, LLC. v. MGN Five Star Cinema, LLC., B282638 (Cal. App. 2018):
5. When the lessor is successful in the unlawful detainer action, the court must also determine the amount of rent and other sums due. (Code of Civ. Proc., 1161.1, subd. (a), 1174, subd. (b); Underwood v. Corsino (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 132, 136.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining the exact amount of damages awarded by a court to a defendant in a personal injury action? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellate court review a determination of the entitlement to fees in a judgment even if there is no postjudgment order determining the amount of fees? (California, United States of America)
Can an unlawful detainer action be consolidated with a separate fraud action? (California, United States of America)
Can a judgment in an unlawful detainer action be used as a bar to recover damages in the present action? (California, United States of America)
How has the court considered the impact of a related action in determining whether to bring an action to trial? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does a juvenile court hearing determine whether a minor should be tried as an adult prior to a determination that the minor's guilt should be determined? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
