How has the court considered the impact of a related action in determining whether to bring an action to trial?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Brooks v. The Rehab. Ctr. of Beverly Hills, B308796 (Cal. App. 2021):
[8]Because the trial court expressly considered this factor, this case is distinguishable from Dowling v. Farmers Ins. Exchange (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 685, which held that it was error to fail[] to consider the potential impact... of appellate proceedings in a related action in determining whether it was impracticable or futile to bring [an] action to trial. (Id. at p. 688.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether a Section 1170.95 sex offender has made a prima facie showing of entitlement to relief, does the trial court have to consider the jury instructions given at the petitioner's trial? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, can the court conduct an independent review of the transcript of the in camera hearing and the records reviewed by the trial court to determine whether any records were improperly withheld? (California, United States of America)
Does a juvenile court hearing determine whether a minor should be tried as an adult prior to a determination that the minor's guilt should be determined? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the appellate court's role in determining whether a defendant satisfied his burden of producing clear and convincing evidence in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the court considered all relevant factors in determining a plaintiff's claim? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
